Skip to content
  • Home
  • Information
    • About
    • Publication Ethics and Malpractice
    • Peer Review Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Log In and Registration
JALAJALA
  • For Authors
    • General Manuscript format
    • Style Guide for Submissions
    • Editing Service
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Permissions
    • Submit Manuscript
  • For Readers
    • Volume 1 – 2019
      • Issue 1 – January
      • Issue 2 – April
      • Issue 3 – July
      • Issue 4 – October
    • Volume 2 – 2020
      • Issue 1 – January
      • Issue 2 – April
      • Issue 3 – July
      • Issue 4 – October
    • Volume 3 – 2021
      • Issue 1 – January
      • Issue 2 – April
      • Issue 3 – July
      • issue 4 – October
    • Volume 4 – 2022
      • Issue 1 – January
      • Issue 2 – April
      • Issue 3 – July
      • Issue 4 – October

Processing Malaysian Indigenous Languages:
A Focus on Phonology and Grammar

Corresponding Author: Asmah Haji Omar
Affiliation: Faculty of Linguistics, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Email: hajiomarasmah@gmail.com
Article First Published:  April 1, 2019 | Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/1yyyyy/xxxxxxx

Citing: Asmah Haji Omar (2019). Processing Malaysian Indigenous Languages: A Focus on Phonology and Gramma. Journal of Asian Linguistic Anthropology. 1, 1, 3-19.


Abstract

Malaysian indigenous languages are of two entirely different families: Austronesian and Austroasiatic. The former consists of Malay and all the languages of Sabah and Sarawak, while the latter the aboriginal languages found only in Peninsular Malaysia. Except for Malay and a few more in Sabah and Sarawak, most of these languages have not been put into writing. This means that no writing system has been ascribed to them, despite the fact that quite a number have been described in terms of phonology, morphology and syntax. From the descriptions available, one gets a picture of their typologies and systems for processing purposes. Concerning typology, there is not much difference between the two families as far as phonemic inventories go, but there are differences in the phonological structures of the syllable and the word. As for morphology, the Austronesian languages are agglutinative, while the Austroasiatic ones are isolative. There is also a difference in the syntactical status of the word, where the former has the two categories of the full word and the particle, and the latter only the full word. This last mentioned difference leads to a divergence between them in the types of phrase, the clause, and the complex sentence. Natural language processing (NLP) is a methodology which is now being applied in the analysis of various aspects of languages. This paper discusses the constraints faced by most of the Malaysian indigenous languages in the application of this methodology.

Keywords: Austronesian, Austroasiatic, Natural Language Processing, Typology.

 

 

SOAS GLOCAL
SOAS Main
Current Issue
All Issues

 


 

General Information

ISSN: 2207-0656
Frequency: Quarterly
Review: Peer reviewed
Rating and Impact: To be updated

Editorial Information
Editors in Chief

N. Hill
S. Needham 
A. Haji Omar

Abstracting / Indexing
  • SCOPUS Indexed
Follow us
Copyright 2017 - 2023 © No content nor contributions to this website and the JALA Journal may be reproduced without written permission by the Journal.
  • All Issues
  • Manuscript format
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Submit Manuscipt
  • Editing Service